Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.
- Thread starter cypherdoc
- Start date
bitsko
Active Member
- Aug 31, 2015
- 730
- 1,532
Experiments often have value until they fail.
We pray our masters will grant us favor for our pulchritude and offer us a small token in his likeness out of fear another suitor will find us worthy.
I get it, you're an anarchist. But your army is smaller than his.
So like, that's just your opinion, man. I see it as an investment in the hyperloop of information.
Post automatically merged:
Wait, what? Do you hate him so much that you won't even listen to him? Does the rage block your listening? I mean, I feel you. That's how I felt about the Orange Monkey. But CSW has been consistent in his description of choosing unbounded computing over internal loops because of the timestamping. His background is in supercomputers and BitCoin was designed to work in parallel. I don't see weather predictors ever using Ethereum. Ever. You think it won't work? It already does.
Last edited:
I don't dislike CSW, I dislike cults. I agree with a lot of what CSW says. Among the things where I don't disagree with him when he says he's a: dick, satoshi, and very bad at marketing. I just have evidence he's a dick, and bad at marketing and he has a cult following.
bitsko
Active Member
- Aug 31, 2015
- 730
- 1,532
when public support for csw involves promoting obvious bullshit such as 'everything is a fork of bsv' or 'do your taxes with btc as an airdrop' or 'bsv has already won' or 'bsv doesnt need exchanges' or 'all the non-bsv exchanges are criminal' i just can't do it.
I can't get behind those garbage narratives because theyre detrimental to bsv.
There is a special layer of hell for csw's bad bsv narratives; where they hold onto and keep bsv trapped...
...spergatory
I can't get behind those garbage narratives because theyre detrimental to bsv.
There is a special layer of hell for csw's bad bsv narratives; where they hold onto and keep bsv trapped...
...spergatory
You do that for BSV or BCH or BTC, either one or all 3 are income, and or 1 is capital gains tax on the cost basis and the other 2 are capital gains with a $0 basis. It doesn't really matter how you do it just be rational, fair, consistent, and honest.
CSW can just give all his Bitcoin to the government and be done with it, and then not have enough money to fight the false accusations in court. My experience with government auditors has revealed that that's not enough, they'll still want more.
Sure, but the BTC one bought in 2015 used a different protocol and had a different mandate to the BTC bought in 2019. If you were to believe the Core fanatics you think it should be called by another name as P2P cash without the need for a trusted 3rd party is misleading.
The 2015 BTC, BCH and BSV, were all included on the ledger, the resulting names are just ways to identify the ledgers and token assets, BCH could have ended up with the BTC ticker and the Bitcoin Core version with an independent denominator, it's just a name for the ledger, the name does not give the ledger its legitimacy.
If we look at this technically and we assume Bitcoin is an implementation of the idea described in the Bitcoin White Paper, we can explain the reasons for the forks. Then ignoring the price, which is what drives the hashing power, and ignoring the names knowing each fork is a new ledger, we can see the 3 implementations of the protocol. all 3 are forks of the original Bitcoin, they just share a common ancestor. They are just virtual assets in a virtual world using the most practical definition of virtual as one can find.
The 2015 BTC, BCH and BSV, were all included on the ledger, the resulting names are just ways to identify the ledgers and token assets, BCH could have ended up with the BTC ticker and the Bitcoin Core version with an independent denominator, it's just a name for the ledger, the name does not give the ledger its legitimacy.
If we look at this technically and we assume Bitcoin is an implementation of the idea described in the Bitcoin White Paper, we can explain the reasons for the forks. Then ignoring the price, which is what drives the hashing power, and ignoring the names knowing each fork is a new ledger, we can see the 3 implementations of the protocol. all 3 are forks of the original Bitcoin, they just share a common ancestor. They are just virtual assets in a virtual world using the most practical definition of virtual as one can find.
bitsko
Active Member
- Aug 31, 2015
- 730
- 1,532
Post automatically merged:
the whole thing is silly.
Post automatically merged:
'i dont care about jobbers' **manipulates assymetric knowledge intensively to benefit his dayjobbing**
Last edited:
Stay focused on what matters, people getting get distracted by the sideshows.
bitsko
Active Member
- Aug 31, 2015
- 730
- 1,532
"Sensible Contract A Feature-Recognition Based Backward-Traceable and Collaborative Contract Model "
Zarathustra
Well-Known Member
- Aug 28, 2015
- 1,439
- 3,797
> already won
For Diodorus, if a future event is not going to happen, then it was true in the past that it would not happen. Since every past truth is necessary (proposition 1), it was necessary that in the past it would not happen. Since the impossible cannot follow from the possible (proposition 2), it must have always been impossible for the event to occur. Therefore if something will not be true, it will never be possible for it to be true, and thus proposition 3 is shown to be false.
en.wikipedia.org
If I were Calvin, and I had inside information and I was absolutely certain that Craig was the man, I too would say BSV already won.
Since I'm not Calvin and I dont have inside information, I won't say BSV already won.
For Diodorus, if a future event is not going to happen, then it was true in the past that it would not happen. Since every past truth is necessary (proposition 1), it was necessary that in the past it would not happen. Since the impossible cannot follow from the possible (proposition 2), it must have always been impossible for the event to occur. Therefore if something will not be true, it will never be possible for it to be true, and thus proposition 3 is shown to be false.
Diodorus Cronus - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Post automatically merged:
If I were Calvin, and I had inside information and I was absolutely certain that Craig was the man, I too would say BSV already won.
Since I'm not Calvin and I dont have inside information, I won't say BSV already won.
Last edited:
