Correct... and the world would be a safer, more equitable and better place when people stopped depending on Imaginary Property (delusions) enforced by the state.No, you should be able to decide for yourself whether you want to market your idea/song/book yourself, or whether you leave it to Amazon and Google for free.
You will not invest a billion dollars in vaccine development if the result of that investment is allowed to be copied.
If you want to solve a need one has to do the work, pretending only one is allowed a monopoly and to profit from the division of labour is a delusion. Creating laws to enforce that delusion is making humanity sick.
We progress when others learn how to help more effectively. Copying is by definition progress, (not stealing) the things we are allowed to copy blossom into infinite creativity.
Post automatically merged:
Anyone can copy it free, but the thing you can't copy is the time stamp and costly signal that says "I paid to the right to the history of digital signatures of the first instance on the blcokchain". That's worth whatever you're willing to pay for it.Should communists be allowed to copy this art work for free?
I suspect it's a result of people spending $0.30 USD for one ETH, which's now worth $1,820 USD today so in real terms all good fortune aside it's about $11,373 or about what you'd pay a commercial artist - less the hype.
Last edited: