Copyrights apply as soon as a work is created. The only reason to register is if you plan on enforcing it. Cease-and-desist letters could have already set sail. This will be interesting to watch unfold.
Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.
- Thread starter cypherdoc
- Start date
lunar
Well-Known Member
- Aug 28, 2015
- 1,001
- 4,290
BitcoinUnlimited needs to start thinking about supporting BSV or it's time for a name change.
@satoshis_sockpuppet @Richy_T you guys have lost it.
Either this gets fully granted (maybe it already has been?) or Craig is going to be in wearing orange prison. How you can't see what's now slapping you in the face is beyond me.
@satoshis_sockpuppet @Richy_T you guys have lost it.
Either this gets fully granted (maybe it already has been?) or Craig is going to be in wearing orange prison. How you can't see what's now slapping you in the face is beyond me.
Or if you plan to impress some folks..
Oh it worked.
Nobody is going to wear an orange suit because of a false copyright claim. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyfraud#Legal_issues)
Are you guys really that fucking stupid? He is doing everything he can to show he's satoshi except for the things that would show that he is satoshi.
Fucking unbelievable.
Norway
Well-Known Member
- Sep 29, 2015
- 2,424
- 6,410
I have some suggestions for new names:
BTC: Shitcoin
BCH: Shitcoin Cash
BU: Shitcoin Unlimited
[doublepost=1558455187,1558454420][/doublepost]
Yes, we are that "fucking" stupid. That's what Occam's razor is telling you, right?
We are so stupid, we developed a true HD Bitcoin © Wallet (+ more, documentation, tokens) inside the cards designed by Visa/MasterCard (1.3 s / contactless tx) and made it illegal to use on any other chain than the Bitcoin © chain without our consent.
Yes, we are "fucking stupid", lol! Cheers! This Bollinger is awesome!
Thanks for showing the diff.@rocks
The Open BSV License is the MIT license with a scoping clause.
To visualise this: Left side is MIT, right side is Open BSV.
IMHO this license is exactly what we'd want then. I'm fine with it.
Otaci
Member
- Jul 26, 2017
- 74
- 384
Show who? And does he care about showing those people?
[doublepost=1558456470,1558455778][/doublepost]If a decision maker in MegaCorp wants to know, do you think he will believe a socially dysfunctional scientist who just got back from a magical crypto show, or a lawyer?
Jonathan Vaage
Member
- Nov 27, 2015
- 80
- 370
lunar
Well-Known Member
- Aug 28, 2015
- 1,001
- 4,290
Norway
Well-Known Member
- Sep 29, 2015
- 2,424
- 6,410
@shadders
Yes, I guess I read this too quick:
Source: https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-sv-version-0-2-0-takes-the-next-step-towards-unlimited-scaling/
In theory, someone could issue a 9GB block on STN, but I guess no one will do it.
Yet, the max blocksize (EB) is increased to 10GB...
I guess we'll have to wait for the conference, he he. See you there!
Looks like I was on to something, lol!
EDIT:
To be clear, the default setting of 128MB MG (Shitcoin Unlimited lingo, Max Generated) in the release of the latest BSV client related to the test network has been broken in a beautiful way. It's hard to know where these tests will end.
Yes, I'm smart enough to understand that it's more difficult to verify many small transactions than a few large ones. I guess these tests are adressing these questions.
I can hear the whining from people like @Peter R and @jtoomim:
- It's not sustained.
- It's not small transactions.
- It's not sustained & small transactions at the same time.
- It's not good enough from some criteria that I just invented.
Last edited:
Norway
Well-Known Member
- Sep 29, 2015
- 2,424
- 6,410
As a member of BU, I will use the name "Shitcoin Unlimited" for BU as long as Shitcoin Unlimited is not supporting a client compatible with Bitcoin © - The original protocol.
[doublepost=1558458938][/doublepost]A consequence of this, is that @solex is the president of Shitcoin Unlimited.
[doublepost=1558459729,1558458793][/doublepost]Don't get me wrong. I like @solex very much. He is a good man, and cool. I used to see him as the Winston Churchill of big blocks. But times are changing. My advice to @solex would be to focus on personal investments, and not the power a person could have defining the future of a changing protocol.
[doublepost=1558460198][/doublepost]For people who don't get it, the mocking name Shitcoin Unlimited for BU has an underlying message. It's a message saying the organization is supporting an unlimited number of shitcoins.
It's a message meaning that the organization supports 1 million shitcoins and no limited supply of shitcoins.
[doublepost=1558458938][/doublepost]A consequence of this, is that @solex is the president of Shitcoin Unlimited.
[doublepost=1558459729,1558458793][/doublepost]Don't get me wrong. I like @solex very much. He is a good man, and cool. I used to see him as the Winston Churchill of big blocks. But times are changing. My advice to @solex would be to focus on personal investments, and not the power a person could have defining the future of a changing protocol.
[doublepost=1558460198][/doublepost]For people who don't get it, the mocking name Shitcoin Unlimited for BU has an underlying message. It's a message saying the organization is supporting an unlimited number of shitcoins.
It's a message meaning that the organization supports 1 million shitcoins and no limited supply of shitcoins.
Last edited:
Otaci
Member
- Jul 26, 2017
- 74
- 384
I agree, its great news. I can't take credit for it, its all down to Brad.
Zarathustra
Well-Known Member
- Aug 28, 2015
- 1,439
- 3,797
Good question @satoshis_sockpuppet. Are you that fucking stupid that you believe such truther bullshit with 100% certainty? I would not. It is conceivable, but not certain.
Jonathan Vaage
Member
- Nov 27, 2015
- 80
- 370
Norway
Well-Known Member
- Sep 29, 2015
- 2,424
- 6,410
@sickpig
Are you 100% sure that the BU client can set EB to 10 GB? I'm not sure. Because your example was just 1 GB.
And no one gave me credit for pushing these issues. I know it's a trivial issue to change the data types of parameters. And yes, I understand that it's not just a 1 line change, because it's relevant everywhere it's used.
But it's not a huge code job. It's a job. But not huge.
Where is @theZerg thanking me for putting the issue of the limited EB values out as a problem? He certainly changed this after BUIP101, if @sickpig is telling the truth.
Where is the cred, @theZerg?
[doublepost=1558464091,1558463277][/doublepost]And I'd like to add to that:
@theZerg convinced me to vote "yes" to his gambler's OP code. I liked the idea of someone being an oracle and publishing data others could use
I proved that these services could be done with basic bitcoin script.
I brought the code.
@theZerg, I don't respect your skills anymore, You're just a thing of the past, unless you re-earn your respect. (You can do it.)
Are you 100% sure that the BU client can set EB to 10 GB? I'm not sure. Because your example was just 1 GB.
And no one gave me credit for pushing these issues. I know it's a trivial issue to change the data types of parameters. And yes, I understand that it's not just a 1 line change, because it's relevant everywhere it's used.
But it's not a huge code job. It's a job. But not huge.
Where is @theZerg thanking me for putting the issue of the limited EB values out as a problem? He certainly changed this after BUIP101, if @sickpig is telling the truth.
Where is the cred, @theZerg?
[doublepost=1558464091,1558463277][/doublepost]And I'd like to add to that:
@theZerg convinced me to vote "yes" to his gambler's OP code. I liked the idea of someone being an oracle and publishing data others could use
I proved that these services could be done with basic bitcoin script.
I brought the code.
@theZerg, I don't respect your skills anymore, You're just a thing of the past, unless you re-earn your respect. (You can do it.)
Why do you want to stay member of Shitcoin Unlimited?
Don't you think that the idea of BU and almost everybody who actually did work for it is fundamentally opposed to the stuff you are promoting?
Come on, we've played this game long enough.
Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto. You know it, I know it. Everybody who can think for themselves knows it. There is no reason to lick his boots.
Except if you expect funding from nChain etc., right @Norway?
Keep burning those bridges...
Richy_T
Well-Known Member
- Dec 27, 2015
- 1,085
- 2,741
And when nothing comes of this copyright filing, excuses will be made and it's business as usual.
Bear in mind that this isn't a trademark claim or anything like that, it's just a copyright claim on the whitepaper (So get your complaints straight, @Norway). Presumably the Theymos owned Wiki can claim they received license directly from Satoshi himself so we can't expect anything interesting there. Is Craig going to go after bitcoin.com? I'll believe it when I see it.
Norway
Well-Known Member
- Sep 29, 2015
- 2,424
- 6,410
@satoshis_sockpuppet
LOL, you're desperate!
Cheers!
Why would I give away my voting power in Shitcoin Unlimited?
It's like giving away your voting power in a "Where should we dump the shit" company.
I certainly don't want to give away that voting power. I don't want shit on my doorstep.
I will stay a member in BU (Shitcoin Unlimited).
[doublepost=1558466157][/doublepost]I'm basically done with @Peter R at this point, I don't see how he can provide any value to me.
I'd still like to hear what @theZerg thinks about our contactless protocol, KaChing, but I don't think he will show his balls. And honestly, his input would probably be not related to reality.
[doublepost=1558466279,1558465599][/doublepost]https://kaching.cards/katp.pdf
LOL, you're desperate!
Cheers!
Why would I give away my voting power in Shitcoin Unlimited?
It's like giving away your voting power in a "Where should we dump the shit" company.
I certainly don't want to give away that voting power. I don't want shit on my doorstep.
I will stay a member in BU (Shitcoin Unlimited).
[doublepost=1558466157][/doublepost]I'm basically done with @Peter R at this point, I don't see how he can provide any value to me.
I'd still like to hear what @theZerg thinks about our contactless protocol, KaChing, but I don't think he will show his balls. And honestly, his input would probably be not related to reality.
[doublepost=1558466279,1558465599][/doublepost]https://kaching.cards/katp.pdf
Richy_T
Well-Known Member
- Dec 27, 2015
- 1,085
- 2,741
Christoph Bergmann
Active Member
With 0.2, bsv reset its scaling testnet. I wonder why... Has the blockchain become to large? Shouldnt this longterm effect also be part of a scaling testnet?
I'm not a fan of bsv license. I don't understand how they can just change it, as they have it from an mit license base. And will nchain be able to arbitrarily change the license in the future?
The 0.2 release also has the option to reject mempool query requests for non whitelisted peers. This also seems like a dangerous path ..
I'm not a fan of bsv license. I don't understand how they can just change it, as they have it from an mit license base. And will nchain be able to arbitrarily change the license in the future?
The 0.2 release also has the option to reject mempool query requests for non whitelisted peers. This also seems like a dangerous path ..