Norway
Well-Known Member
- Sep 29, 2015
- 2,424
- 6,410
I get it, you can't blow your cover. But if you need help splitting BCH with votes or anything else, there's always PM... nudge, nudge, say no more ...
... ( ?)Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.
- Thread starter cypherdoc
- Start date
... ( ?)
- Dec 16, 2015
- 2,806
- 6,088
I did. Tom's criticism there is directed at the miners.
So I ask you, how exactly is this proving something I said wrong?
bitsko
Active Member
- Aug 31, 2015
- 730
- 1,532
Yes, but you appear to allege this is an 'SV lawsuit', and consistently fail to provide any proof.
Will you retract your rather serious allegations? It's possible that they 'endanger the lives of regular persons'... (lol @imuname)
- Dec 16, 2015
- 2,806
- 6,088
This is just common sense and logic. I know this sort of thing demands a retraction in your cult, @bitsko. Wasn't talking to you btw, was asking @cypherdoc. You guys having a shift rotation?
You keep holding those medium block steel beams steady while @Norway melts them with his BCH splitting powers.
You keep holding those medium block steel beams steady while @Norway melts them with his BCH splitting powers.
Norway
Well-Known Member
- Sep 29, 2015
- 2,424
- 6,410
@LocalBitcolnCash It's time to get that license like your "sister" LocalBitcoins.com have done.
bitsko
Active Member
- Aug 31, 2015
- 730
- 1,532
'BSV is suing people' has nothing to do with common sense and logic. BSV is a technology.
And the bitcoin community continues to fragment over disagreements on everything from block size, to functionality, to development processes and even philosophies. Originally Bitcoin was one community, then core limitation forced fragmentation in the form of the first wave of forks (ethereum, ect.) but Bitcoin purists remained, then the scaling wars and censorship forced a split in the Bitcoin community and all of the large blockers separated, now yet another split over disagreements on what big blocks means. This thread's own history and participation is a reflection of that fragmentation.
This was the attack angle against Bitcoin that we did not see, and it is why a stable protocol is such a threat.
BTW, this fragmentation is normal. The US rebels thought they were 100% in agreement when separating from British rule (and kicked out large numbers of localists after the war to Canada). But then to their surprise after the red coats were removed, they had significant disagreements among themselves on just about everything. These disagreements continued and it took Lincoln's war to settle matters.
A stable protocol in a way is equivalent to Lincoln's war in that it settles many matters. For it to win requires superior adoption and ecosystem growth rather than superior industrial capability and invasion.
wow, such limited reading comprehension. this is clearly a slap at a centralized ABC. let me quote him again :
"Such a strategy allows for a majority implementation to effectively act as gatekeepers of determining the content of these scheduled forks and is anything but representative. The artificial deadlines are a centralizing and ultimately destabilizing force on development."
how many times do I have to explain that the miners are captured/intimidated by an ABC dev team that insists and spreads propaganda that a 32mb block limit is necessary?
shift rotation? we're well known with most of us with real identities. you on the other hand post anonymously and so frequently one has to wonder if your nick is on shift rotation. you, the guy who supposedly doesn't have the time or interest to dev ABC. seems to me like your main interest is GCBU. whodathunk, Mr. Saboteur ?
- Dec 16, 2015
- 2,806
- 6,088
I said "SV". As in short for "SV supporters". Maybe a part of the SV community, cheered on by the majority and the figureheads of SV.
Reading is hard, but comprehension is harder.
Last edited:
@freetrader
>It's clear that the plaintiffs are not BCH supporters, otherwise they would be suing the BSV side.
How much poor logic do you think you can get away with? UAC could easily be 100% invested in BCH and sue ABC colluders for it's price plummet (BSV hadn't had a price plummet since it had no price since it didn't exist) , especially after all the public conspiracy proclamations from guys like Brekken and Kain_niak.
>It's clear that the plaintiffs are not BCH supporters, otherwise they would be suing the BSV side.
How much poor logic do you think you can get away with? UAC could easily be 100% invested in BCH and sue ABC colluders for it's price plummet (BSV hadn't had a price plummet since it had no price since it didn't exist) , especially after all the public conspiracy proclamations from guys like Brekken and Kain_niak.
Last edited:
Norway
Well-Known Member
- Sep 29, 2015
- 2,424
- 6,410
These "SV supporters" existed long before bitcoin was born. They sued Facebook before the BCH/BSV split.
lunar
Well-Known Member
- Aug 28, 2015
- 1,001
- 4,290
bitsko
Active Member
- Aug 31, 2015
- 730
- 1,532
Some lawsuit mill is maybe part of the SV 'community'? My dude. What has happened.
[doublepost=1557513309][/doublepost]I think what has happened was BCH caused a people fork, and now finds itself in competition with BSV, some try to ignore it but a lot of people try and smear it, like you.
- Dec 16, 2015
- 2,806
- 6,088
Norway
Well-Known Member
- Sep 29, 2015
- 2,424
- 6,410
you're struggling mightily to keep up the retorts.Your words, not mine
Zarathustra
Well-Known Member
- Aug 28, 2015
- 1,439
- 3,797
Oh yes, that is perfect. (could make the same argument with the US constitution, despite best efforts to turn it into a "living document")I think I prefer this analogy.
Should we now refer to the v0.1 protocol and white paper as the Bitcoin Magna Carta? It really emphasizes the point.
Last edited:
Zarathustra
Well-Known Member
- Aug 28, 2015
- 1,439
- 3,797
We need BU, and at the moment the BSV software is the closest to BU, and this gap is increasing exponentially.
Last edited: