@JayJuanGee Adam did post the reasons he was banned, it was for double posting and such. you do realise the reasons are nonsense, you'd know it if you were one of the 13,000,000 views of or the WO 1.0 and 2.0 thread.
If bitcointalk.org wanted to clean up, by all means, your approach would be a good start - send a warning drawing attention to the rules, and then punish with a bann hammer and enforce without discrimination..
Prior to my earlier posts, I had seen Adam's description of the reasons for his ban, and I had also been pretty active in WO 1.0 thread in the past couple of years including the past several months.. In the past couple of years, I am likely personally responsible for more than 20,000 views in the W.O. 1.0 thread... hahahahahaha.
I hate to say anything potentially negative about Adam because I believe that he has done a lot to contribute to various bitcoin discussion and sharing his knowledge and experiences; however, in the past few months, some of his posts and threads had been heavily advocating and sometimes even bordering on crazy and illogical.... I mean sometimes he would tone it down for a while, and then again ramp it up. I even personally highlighted my view regarding those kinds of postings on a few occasions and sometimes he would admit that he had been kind of getting carried away.
I'm fairly certain that it is not easy for any forum owner (or administrator) to decide to suspend or to ban members, especially if the members are highly regarded on their forum, and if none of us really knows the exact dynamics of the considerations for the banning, then the forum owners (moderators) retain considerable discretion regarding the extent to which they chose to warn or to publicize their suspension and/or banning standards.
Adults surely don't appreciate others imposing rules on them (through banning and suspension), and also they do not appreciate what would seem to be lack of recognition regarding contributions that they have made in the past. Yet, even if Adam made a whole hell-of-a-lot of contributions (which we know he has), he only retains some entitlement to ownership of those contributions when he stays in good standing with the owner of the forum because it seems that in fact the owner of the forum becomes the owner of the contributions of Adam over the years....
Anyhow, no matter what there are going to be disagreements and fall-out whenever rules are enforced and probably moreso when they are enforced on high profile members and/or when there seem to be changes in the standard (or even arbitrariness as some people have accused).