This is worthy of inclusion in the thread. I'm looking forward to the economic majority determining the outcome, not gavel-bangers on dev IRC.
“We will upgrade regardless of whether Bitcoin Core is updated,” Armstrong said. “Capacity planning is something you should try to get ahead of. Growth can be unpredictable, and I want to remove all blockers to Bitcoin's success. I've been disappointed to see how slow Bitcoin Core has moved on this issue, and we're open to switching forks.”
Question, who is more important and knowledgeable regarding bitcoin? Someone who founded a successful business, raised huge money, gained millions of users, navigated a complicated regulatory environment and significantly grown the ecosystem? Or a few otherwise un-notable programmers who latched onto a github project and have made a small number of code edits to an already working system?
The BS crew may have been able to push around small reddit communities and feel big as a result, but I think they are going to find out just how important they are compared to larger players in the ecosystem who all want larger blocks.
[doublepost=1446592372][/doublepost]
@Zarathustra
i miss my Monero pimps; kazuki, iCE, smooth, rpietila, etc.
rpitila is still pushing it. He is still on bitcointalk telling people "you can have the equivalent of 10K BTC today, just sell your bitcoin and buy Monero." But no one seems to be listening.
I still maintain the "in the protocol" aspect of mixing coins was just marketing nonsense and unmeaningful from a technical perspective, you can easily layer such functionality on top of Bitcoin if you want.
That and network effects usually trump all.