Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.

[freetrader]

SV campfire marshmallows narrative about how the 'bcash' implementation is lost seems to be burning to a crisp.

 

[79b79aa8]

i still think it would be a good idea for a competing implementation to exist in case BSV devs go rogue

i don't think the BSV devs are planning on going rogue. they are developing teranode.

remember that dude TPTB_WANTS_WAR who trolled me relentlessly for over a year way back when?

iirc, TPTB was @AnonyMint.

 

[cypherdoc]

>i don't think the BSV devs are planning on going rogue. they are developing teranode.

i don't think so either, but not only do i have to satisfy my own need for a Plan B, we need to satisfy all the naysayers needs for a Plan B.

>iirc, TPTB was @AnonyMint.

i'd say you're correct on that. now who was @AnonyMint?

 

[freetrader]

 

[79b79aa8]

>i don't think the BSV devs are planning on going rogue. they are developing teranode.

i don't think so either, but not only do i have to satisfy my own need for a Plan B, we need to satisfy all the naysayers needs for a Plan B.

nChain has allocated a budget to develop teranode.
there is no similar structure to make that happen for BCH.
the only money pot readily available for volunteer BCH devs are BU funds.
oh, the things ABC would do with those funds.

 

[shilch]

this is fucking incredible. I've made this exact argument for years on r/btc and r/Bitcoin in promoting both ABC and Bitcoin UNLIMITED and got tons of upvotes as big blockists supposedly understood. now today, May 8, 2019, I'm getting downvotes for arguing the EXACT same thing. suddenly, small 32mb blocks have become the new narrative. WTF is going on? at least with early adopters like me you get consistency:

Lol, remember that time when the headlines have been "BSV blocks took 40 minutes to propagate"? Now it's "well-known that propagation is not an issue but [insert whatever you like]".

 

[Norway]

Lol, remember that time when @jtoomim said it's impossible for incentivized miners to send a 1MB block in less than 14.7 seconds through the great firewall of China while claiming to be a network expert?

 

[Christoph Bergmann]

Lol, remember that time when the headlines have been "BSV blocks took 40 minutes to propagate"? Now it's "well-known that propagation is not an issue but [insert whatever you like]".

They learned from the best ...

Seeing the good old core narrative style repeated on the ABC side since October is disgusting. The king is dead, long live the King.

I'm just tired of this shit. Maybe it's good that BU dropped bsv, now we can come to a rest

 

[bitsko]

What is better for BCH; continue to repeat the core pundit fearful conservative/ antimarket narrative or to stop posting in the same places and try their best to exclude and ostracize BSV

 

[cypherdoc]

the only money pot readily available for volunteer BCH devs are BU funds.

is that why they're raiding this place?
[doublepost=1557361853][/doublepost]

Lol, remember that time when @jtoomim said it's impossible for incentivized miners to send a 1MB block in less than 14.7 seconds through the great firewall of China while claiming to be a network expert?

yes

 

[cbeast]

nChain has allocated a budget to develop teranode.
there is no similar structure to make that happen for BCH.
the only money pot readily available for volunteer BCH devs are BU funds.
oh, the things ABC would do with those funds.

CSW's rant about folks not wanting to invest $20k into infrastructure feels like a clue about terranode.

 

[freetrader]

Just a note that if Ken Shishido is allowed to change his vote in the ongoing election, then every BU member has that right.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/voting-is-open-for-buips-113—116-118—124.23924/#post-93088

 

[sgbett]

I agree with the gist, either he should prove it in public or in court in whatever way, or just stop emphasising how he's satoshi - the repeated talk about "I am Satoshi and I'm here to kill off Satoshi" appears contradictory. But then again, maybe he behaves exactly that way to effectively "kill off Satoshi", idk.
Whatever it is, I consider Wright's content very original (especially pointing out the incentives in bitcoin) - no matter whether he digged into all bitcoin-related material out there or whether he actually was involved in the creation of bitcoin.

If we assume for a sec he’s telling the truth about bitcoin not having a leader then this is the only way to right the ship and also kill the king - not literally, but figuratively. It’s about not worshipping false idols. It’s about believing in Bitcoin not Satoshi.

Make Satoshi unworshippable. That’s how you kill him.

(Been watching American Gods )

 

[bitsko]

Just a note that if Ken Shishido is allowed to change his vote in the ongoing election, then every BU member has that right.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/voting-is-open-for-buips-113—116-118—124.23924/#post-93088

not too late to purge im-uname then @freetrader

 

[cypherdoc]

Just a note that if Ken Shishido is allowed to change his vote in the ongoing election, then every BU member has that right.

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/voting-is-open-for-buips-113—116-118—124.23924/#post-93088

such unsympathetic freetrade:

https://bitco.in/forum/threads/voting-is-open-for-buips-113—116-118—124.23924/#post-93098

 

[RollieMe]

I found this interesting:

Source

 

[bitsko]

@Klakurka , 'incompatible'
[doublepost=1557412143][/doublepost]that is interesting. good to see the perseverance of flowee the hub.

schnoor before core!

 

[cypherdoc]

I found this interesting:

Source

looks like alot of BCH supporters don't trust ABC, lol.
[doublepost=1557418160,1557417257][/doublepost]you gotta luv Bitcoin. theoretically, no matter how many times and into how many small bits the hacker splits these coins, trackers like Chainanalysis will be hot on the tails of the stolen coins. problem is, if hacker A buys coffee from innocent merchant B, who buys coffee beans from supplier C, who buys whatever from supplier D, who then tries to cash in BTC for fiat on exchange E, then gets a "nope" from exchange E b/c of blacklisting, you still have the hacker running around free unless you're willing to go back and interview everyone along the line for the cost of the original $3 coffee. and that's supposing you can identify them exactly.

 

[lunar]

implementation is lost

Looks like a long list of protocol tweaks, have you had any feedback from app developers and services using the BCH chain? Is this going to give them any extra work?

lol, Poor ole Roger is going to find himself in prison again, if he keeps on that path. Talk about kicking the gorilla in the nuts. Perhaps the second time round will cure the problems caused from his first trip?

Just heard on the radio, paraphrased.

Everyone knows Craig is a fraud and not the real Satoshi, It's already well priced into BSV. What do you think will happen when/if he's fully vindicated?
[doublepost=1557433335,1557432372][/doublepost]Quelle surprise. Which one of you pointed this out.... years ago? @cypherdoc maybe?


On the blockchain.

https://bico.media/1f8e0c5f47b470f3df0f06f3d2939adccc1f2b7dafa0b4a32a69663cda2c6760.pdf
[doublepost=1557433748][/doublepost]

 

[cypherdoc]

bwahahaha, BCH's idol going down the tubes: