Wall Observer

[Lee Adams]

Every block is full regardless of the size it's just 1MB blocks are limited and preventing more bitcoin transactions. Impeding growth.

To me, this is just semantics. I think we all know what we mean by full blocks (i.e. nearly 1000000 bytes in size).

 

[ChartBuddy]

 

[adamstgbit]

moving higher!

 

[JimboToronto]

Cautiously.

Quick, somebody buy 20k coins. Get this thing really moving up.

 

[8up]

moving higher!

when is your legendary Bit Movements thread coming to town?

 

[Bagatell]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=831547.msg14549993#msg14549993

 

[Bagatell]

 

[adamstgbit]

when is your legendary Bit Movements thread coming to town?

only problem is i see no way to lock the thread.

altho i guess it wouldn't be horrible to have discussion in that thread. but i do wish i could lock threads...

 

[AdrianX]

To me, this is just semantics. I think we all know what we mean by full blocks (i.e. nearly 1000000 bytes in size).

It's way more than semantic, to a technician or a utilitarian it's largely irrelevant.

Make no mistake it's framing! it's affecting the conversation. If we kept talking about how limiting transaction volume is limiting growth the block limit conversation would have a differe tone it would be framed difficulty.

But we're not, we're talking about full blocks are they a problem or not.

This framing has an impact on how most think. For you it may be irrelevant but for the casual observe it has an impact.

 

[ChartBuddy]

 

[Fatman3002]

BAAAAAAHHHH!!!!
[doublepost=1460744332][/doublepost]

choo choo
[doublepost=1460744851,1460743859][/doublepost]

choo choo

 

[Fatman3002]

choo choo
[doublepost=1460746871,1460746145][/doublepost]

choo choo

 

[Bagatell]

 

[ChartBuddy]

 

[ChartBuddy]

 

[ChartBuddy]

 

[ChartBuddy]

 

[ChartBuddy]

 

[ChartBuddy]

 

[Richy_T]

So close... I hear ChartBuddy pays out for three full blocks...

(Edit: Oh, we've already had that. Never mind.)