Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.

[NashGuy]

Its because you haven't read the literature which you are CLAIMING to refute!

 

[freetrader]

@cypherdoc: Let's be fair here: This is not (typical) small blockist logic. It's way more entertaining.

there is no one else in the world that can debate the legitimacy of Ideal Money in regard to bitcoin but me.

Ok. Not sure what it is that you want to talk about to us then. Pick a topic.

 

[Norway]

My reddit account pokertravis has been around for two years and was created to facilitate discussion about the relation between bitcoin and nash's works. Thats the best I can remember and cite at the moment.

Link, or it didn't happen.

 

[NashGuy]

@zarathurstra

Ridiculous

Your assertion is that you the man you reference is close to Nash in knowledge of money systems. Nash came up with Ideal Money in the 1950's/60's and had over 50 years to develop it and research on the subject.

Are you claiming to know how knowledgeable Nash is on the subject. Are you claiming you are familiar with his vast works? Will you back up your assertions?

 

[Norway]

Looks like @jonny1000 got tired and needed help from @NashGuy lol!

 

[cliff]

Seems familiar (note recent tweet storm) - https://twitter.com/desantis

NashGuy - no offense implied, just curious:
1. That your twitter?
2. What's got you fired up today? I mean, this stuff has been around a long time - why bring it up so loudly now?

 

[NashGuy]

@Norway "Link, or it didn't happen." I'll let @cypherdoc repeat what you obviously didn't read, that I am /u/pokertravis and I was in fact invited here by cypherdoc. My account IS two years old and feel free to verify the claim I made: https://www.reddit.com/user/pokertravis/

Are there any sincere players here?

 

[cypherdoc]

You're right. I apologize to all small blockists for the insult

@cypherdoc: Let's be fair here: This is not (typical) small blockist logic. It's way more entertaining.

 

[cliff]

@cypherdoc: Let's be fair here: This is not (typical) small blockist logic. It's way more entertaining.

Well, I'm learning lots today that's for sure.

 

[Zarathustra]

"Are you claiming to know how knowledgeable Nash is on the subject."

Are you claiming to know how knowledgeable Paul C. Martin is on the subject?
Money without interest is science fiction. Fantasy Land.

 

[Norway]

@Norway "Link, or it didn't happen." I'll let @cypherdoc repeat what you obviously didn't read, that I am /u/pokertravis and I was in fact invited here by cypherdoc. My account IS two years old and feel free to verify the claim I made: https://www.reddit.com/user/pokertravis/

Are there any sincere players here?

Link to your first relevant post, not your reddit profile. I'm not your mom.

 

[NashGuy]

1. not my twitter

2. I was invited here. I have long been known as an outspoken proponent of Ideal Money and its relation to bitcoin by the bitcoin community. In this thread I am just answering accusations and calling out baseless claims.
[doublepost=1469050619][/doublepost]@Norway do your own homework.

 

[Norway]

@NashGuy It's not my homework. It's your homework. I'm the teacher giving you a low grade.

 

[NashGuy]

I have already jumped through hoops, no sincere player will believe this groups baseless accusations going forward. I am CLEARLY who I say I am in this regard.

 

[Norway]

You're just talking about the hoops. You are not jumping through them.

 

[freetrader]

In this thread I am just answering accusations and calling out baseless claims.

This is perhaps the wrong thread to play victim. Take @Bloomie's suggestion, please.

Bullshit like this does not pass the sincerity test:

You don't know why I haven't given away the essays publically myself?

Lemme tell the sincere players here...

Its because there have been trolls and insincere disingenuous people (like ytdm) that run around refuting nash's works, claiming they have read it, while also not realizing that I can show that their claim is baseless.

 

[NashGuy]

You're just talking about the hoops. You are not jumping through them.

Absolutely I verified my account on bitcointalk.org for this classless crowd. So I have shown you to be disingenuous as well.

Are there any sincere players here or are we finished? Anyone?

 

[pekatete]

I have already jumped through hoops, no sincere player will believe this groups baseless accusations going forward. I am CLEARLY who I say I am in this regard.

I've followed this particular conversation and I am inclined to think @NashGuy has the upper-hand on the specific issue of multiple John Nash "papers", but that is as far as I'll go (not touching the John Nash specialist bit). But I also think the conversation has taken a trollish turn (though anyone would be hard-pressed to beat our very own resident village troll!).

 

[Norway]

Absolutely I verified my account on bitcointalk.org for this classless crowd. So I have shown you to be disingenuous as well.

Are there any sincere players here or are we finished? Anyone?

What do you mean "Are we finished"? This is an old thread, and it will certainly not finish soon.

 

[NashGuy]

I've followed this particular conversation and I am inclined to think @NashGuy has the upper-hand on the specific issue of multiple John Nash "papers", but that is as far as I'll go (not touching the John Nash specialist bit). But I also think the conversation has taken a trollish turn (though anyone would be hard-pressed to beat our very own resident village troll!).

Sincere players!