Some more Mike Hearn quotes from the BitcoinXT mailing list:
Again - Samson's view makes no sense because he is assuming "hard forks" are hard. I actually have come to hate that terminology (I certainly did not invent it) because it's so misleading.
In a world in which the community feels free to execute hard forks whenever necessary, after some forward planning, setting up a BIP101 style formula is merely a convenience intended to reduce the likelyhood of needing one. But if it turns out that formula is wrong, OK, make a new BIP, and fork again.
I actually talked to Samson a few months ago. He couldn't grasp the idea that the system was changeable. The fact that Samson can't see any explanation for BIP101 beyond arrogance/recklessness says a lot about his worldview - he thinks BIP101 would be forever, even though if it happened, that would be proof that it wasn't!
>>If they are changeable why can't we put in his preferred future blocksize limit? Could he not say: "It's changeable why don't you adopt my view?"
Yes, but
1. We can say the same thing: it's changeable, so why don't you adopt our view?
2. Changing the code would mean a new BIP, new code, new testing, etc. For what? The difference between 4mb and 8mb as an upper limit is not that large.
3. They have no consistency. Different pools say different things.
4. The Chinese miners have made it very clear at Hong Kong that they won't consider running anything except Core. In fact their view is that they shouldn't have to think or have opinions on how Bitcoin works.
Reflect for a moment upon the last point, and what that means.
source: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bitcoin-xt/b05mPLx1HWgThin blocks doesn't change the block size limit, it just changes how the data is relayed on the network. A 1mb block remains 1mb for the purposes of the calculation.
The scaling solution - the only scaling solution that isn't totally insane - is to raise the limit and keep raising it so the network always has plenty of capacity.
I realise you are searching for a political solution. If you wish to code up and test a different proposal to BIP 101, fork Core, rebrand it, then build and distribute it, you are welcome to do so.