Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.

[sgbett]

Let us also not forget that when CSW sues for defamation this is an attack on us all. When gmax does the same, meh, not so much.

 

[Zarathustra]

The difference between me and CSW is that I don't have to forge anything in a court of law

The difference between me and CSW is that CSW's assertion is a real person's assertions, backed by a statutory declaration of another real person, while my assertion is an assertion of one of my user accounts, backed by hot air and which I will delete and open a new one as soon as it becomes necessary.

 

[cypherdoc]

oh my

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactions-btc-bch-bsv.html#3m

 

[torusJKL]

The above graph makes me almost yawn.

This is where the action is now:

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactions-eth-bsv.html#3m

 

[Zarathustra]

@torusJKL

I'm coming now, I'm coming to reward them
First we take Blockstream, then we take Buterin

I'm guided by a signal in the heavens
I'm guided by this birthmark on my skin
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons
First we take Blockstream, then we take Buterin

I'd really like to live beside you, baby
I love your body and your spirit and your clothes
But you see that line there moving through the station?
I told you, I told you, told you, I was one of those
Ah you loved me as a loser, but now you're worried that I just might win
You know the way to stop me, but you don't have the discipline

How many nights I prayed for this, to let my work begin
First we take Blockstream, then we take Buterin

 

[cypherdoc]

next we take @freetrader
[doublepost=1575537061][/doublepost]ahahaha, wasn't this guy head BCH of BCH? their most prolific dev? another greedy dev bites the dust. read thru his posts and see how he dissembles about decentralization and how poorly he understands Bitcoin in general. poor Roger, he's funded this guy up his wazoo only to get used :

 

[cypherdoc]

let's compare and contrast unwriter and Cardona. both are their coins star devs starting their own speculative projects for profit. great. but look at the outcome as to how and what they chose. unwriter chooses the chain that's promised to scale; whose shown that it can and will via blocksize increases and a soon to be removed limit. and a protocol lockdown so as to not waste his investment and time in the far future. he's also seen the tx and blocksize growth as solid indicators that this strategy is working. Cardona, otoh, has already admitted defeat for BCH /ABC as he's seen the attitudes and threats of a captured ABC dev that doesn't believe onchain scaling is possible (Armani and amaury thru his dedication to 32mb limit) and who's dedicated itself to q6mo hard forks that have been shown to fork off dev projects if they can't see the future of what's in Amaury's mind (see that dev that krawisx interviewed about this a while back). he's also seen the decreasing tx growth trajectory on the crippled BCH chain and it looks ominous. to fund this all, he needs a shitcoin and what sounds like POS, of all things. unwriter otoh, raised a huge amount of cash by investors in a very short time based on sound investment and technical principles alone and will dedicate his project to offchain scaling on BSV. Cardona stated that he will dedicate his time in 2020 to Earth, or whatever he calls it, lol.

let's see how @freetrader tries to spin this despite calling this place a shithole and saying he's done with me a bunch of times. it's his job after all.

 

[AdrianX]

next we take @freetrader
[doublepost=1575537061][/doublepost]ahahaha, wasn't this guy head BCH of BCH? their most prolific dev? another greedy dev bites the dust. read thru his posts and see how he dissembles about decentralization and how poorly he understands Bitcoin in general. poor Roger, he's funded this guy up his wazoo only to get used :

To think this guy had Roger's ear at the time of the BCH BSV fork. Oh, how people misunderstand bitcoin. Why even bother if you have a flawed foundation, it's like they need to learn why Bitcoin is designed the way it is.

EARTH is a state-of-the-art network built from the ground up for global traffic

• 2000 txs per second
• Cash, tokens and smart contracts as first-class citizens
• 3 second blocks with full confirmation in 1 minute
• Turing-complete smart contracts
• Governance via Delegated PoS

 

[cypherdoc]

that's really sad. makes you wonder about the quality of all the stuff he devved for BCH.

 

[cypherdoc]

"That’s the multi-trillion dollar (or bitcoin) question for the decade ahead."

https://www.dbresearch.com/PROD/RPS_EN-PROD/PROD0000000000503196/Imagine_2030.pdf

 

[bitsko]

this was the guy giving a 'hang loose' in 90% of photos...

 

[cypherdoc]

poor @freetrader:

"Bitcoin SV (BSV) now stands head and shoulders above the rest"
https://lydianz.com/bitcoin-sv-bsv-now-stands-head-and-shoulders-above-the-rest/

 

[Norway]

When BSV has mooned, I will organize a GCBU meetup!

EDIT:
To prepare for this, I have saved existing and previous BU members' public keys with this transaction ID:
98bcaa9d1ff3eb11ab762897b399c5066e33e68918c2b23e6025f905a76528bb

 

[lunar]

Leaving ETH in the dust.

 

[Norway]

I wonder why this graph doesn't show the tx flippening with ETH yet:
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactions-eth-bsv.html#3m

EDIT: Probably related to intervals, measuring points, granularity etc. But it will be clear to everyone very soon.
[doublepost=1575658139][/doublepost]Shitcoin Unlimited (BU) can continue its "hard" work of scaling that limpy green graph at the bottom of @lunar 's chart.

 

[lunar]

Blockchair is a 24hr moving window, whereas bitinfo updates daily at midnight.

BSV now over 800k Txs 24hr volume.
https://blockchair.com/compare

 

[Norway]

@lunar Yeah, this is awesome! All the shit ICO-coins on ETH combined is less tx's than a few basic paid services on BSV.

It's going to be harsh. And Shitcoin Unlimited (BU) will be left with the tax man, no accounting and no purpose.
[doublepost=1575671529][/doublepost]Did @solex volunteer for the president position for the next period to do something, or just to prevent a new president from looking at the economic history of Shitcoin Unlimited?
[doublepost=1575671949,1575671305][/doublepost]

We intend to publish a financial statement, and it will definitely be out this month. Ideally these can be repeated every six months, but as I point out, the current rules do not mandate any level of detail. Nevertheless, we have gone far beyond them in transparency already.

[doublepost=1575672407][/doublepost]I'm not sure if everyone noticed, but the officers and top devs of BU suddenly started to make BUIPS to get money.

Why did they do it?

Because their secret donation income dried out.

My theory is that all the top dogs in Shitcoin Unlimited was on a secret payroll when the split between BCH and BSV happened.

Bought the same way Blockstream bought slutty core devs.

Litmus test: They will refuse to tell you who funded them in public. And how much.
[doublepost=1575673023][/doublepost]Both @theZerg and @Peter Tschipper admitted in their BUIP's that they had funding from anonymous donors.

@Peter R didn't, but he wanted money. Most likely, he has lost a source of income. And he called it funding the chief scientist/Ironman while he is elected as secretary.

BU is not a healthy organisation. Turn it into a company and fix the regulatory issues, or go bust.

 

[Norway]

A company is much more effective than a charity organisation.

Bosses are kicking ass/expecting results from people like @shadders and @Otaci.

And they deliver in a timely fashion (sort of). I love the way they move bitcoin forward.

BU devs are not even close. They are losers. Brilliant devs in a small pond without competition. But losers when exposed to competition.

Keep up or stay behind.
[doublepost=1575675208][/doublepost]Big mining operation is now implementing the basic principles Thomas and I published a paper on:
https://coingeek.com/squire-announces-testing-of-bitcoin-sv-node/

BU devs never got the point when we published our IBS paper. It's very simple, yet powerful:
https://www.bitcoin.no/ibs.pdf
[doublepost=1575675481][/doublepost]@Peter R was more interested in classifying IBS as a "pre consensus" project than actually understand that it was never a consensus pre hash discovery, but just an efficient way to communicate your blocks to other miners.
[doublepost=1575675872,1575674900][/doublepost]Long story short: IBS reduce "block propagation time" (Huuuuge problem for BCH people) to the time to send a blockheader + tiny amount of data independent of how big the block is.
[doublepost=1575676019][/doublepost]BU and BCH are so f*cked up in politics and lack of incentivised interest driving bitcoin forward, it's DOA.
[doublepost=1575676183][/doublepost]BU is just a handful of people milking an old donation trying to avoid the tax man.
[doublepost=1575676274][/doublepost]They will fail avoiding the tax man. The tax man is coming for you. You will pay.

 

[Norway]

Newly re-elected @solex has some interesting work ahead. He has to incorporate BU in some jurisdiction. He has to do accounting for every single satoshi spent over many years. And he has to figure out the tax.

He should probably show what's going on to BU members. Members should know that the 3 people controlling BU funds are hiding their spending from the membership.

If he is too lazy and doesn't work it out, he will be given an orange suit for free.

I currently consider the BU funds as stolen by @solex, @theZerg and @Peter R because they refuse to tell the membership how the funds are spent.

 

[cypherdoc]

oh my lord:


[doublepost=1575694154][/doublepost]
[doublepost=1575694314][/doublepost]oh, and can't forget our new favorite: