Thanks for the links
@go1111111 The truth is abstract and relative, one shooed not seek truth, but rater seek to understand based on empirical observations. Reality is ones personal interpretation, beliefs cloud reality all the time, The block size being one such belief.
Projecting the "Core is evil" belief as a way to discriminate between those who support or don't support the Core vision, it is an
Attitude polarization projection.
The reality is there is no Core, Core is an OSS project managed in a similar way to otter successful OOS projects.
The problem with Core is it's not an effective way to manage the most powerful
meme that shapes human evolution, the meme of money.
Removing the 1MB limit from bitcoin allows a greater interconnected and interdependent network to emerge, one that will catapult human cooperation to a new paradigm in evolution.
Categorizing
"people who fall into "Core is evil" beliefs" is naive, the people who do not support Core have an understanding. They intuitively understand that a few hundred developers using the typical OSS model on github to manage decentralized global economic cooperation protocol is not effective. It can not scale, it is easily infiltrated and corrupted. It won't serve to encourage economic cooperation through the use of bitcoin.
"evil" is a subjective, it is an adjective to describe a relative morel judgment, when you see people use this word you need to ask them what is it about X that makes it morally repugnant?
because nothing is actually evil its just relatively undesirable based on empirical observations.