@solex
The miners are not happy with the blocks-full situation but are giving Core every chance honor the HK agreement...... While no block limit is probably best, having an algorithmic limit is the most realistic option......
That's good news to hear. It can get a little disheartening sifting through all the shit posts on Reddit and incessant trolling. One group of developers should not be able to dictate the direction of the protocol at such a crucial stage in it's development. - I was led to believe this was OPEN source. and that stood for "collaboration" in the pure scientific sense, rather than it's more recently used 'prisoner of war' sense as Dr Back uttered it.
I tend to agree that an algorithmic method has the best chance for success here, as no limit requires an almost religious belief that a free market on block space will function effectively. Having watched this fuss with all of you for the past year, it's clear not many are ready for that kind of leap in understanding. Unlimited will be ready when they are ;-)
I will admit, having lived entirely in BTC for some time now, that over the last 6 months selling up had crossed my mind. If it were not for the wisdom held within this thread, and the many excellent articles from
@Justus Ranvier @DanielKrawisz @
KonradSGraf. + many more, I think the majority of logical leaps in understanding to get to this point would have escaped me. Bitcoin is quite simply the best form of money mankind has yet achieved. As such selling up is illogical. (medium - long term thinking). Perfect money is the language of the free market, it was born there, it will exist there, and it will adapt there until it is no longer required.
We've already established humanity has all the tools required to perfect free market money, the only question left to ask is how long it will take to get us there.
Ps if the gods of the free market are listening? Another order of magnitude in price would certainly help to speed things along.