- Dec 16, 2015
- 2,806
- 6,088
You did damn fine - I dare anyone to do better.Ehh... I didn't do that well she's pretty intense f2f and there were some technical difficulties. Also, you know I'm trying to thread the line between accuracy and too much technical detail.
Just call it "Xtreme Thinblocks" next time, please - there's a lot of confusion around thin blocks and perhaps we should (a) distinguish Peter Tschipper's concept from the rest and (b) make it easier for ppl to find the source info by calling it that
[doublepost=1456976368,1456975187][/doublepost]Meanwhile, from the "i-am-technically-correct" side of Peter Todd's brain emerged a thought chain that resulted in the following verbalisation which caught my attention as a candidate for entry in a future "Book of Famous Peter Todd Quotes & Rationalizations":
Source: http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-March/012507.htmlYou know, I do agree with you.
But see, this is one of the reasons why we keep reminding people that
strictly speaking a hardfork *is* an altcoin, and the altcoin can change
any rule currently in Bitcoin.
It'd be perfectly reasonable to create an altcoin with a 22-million-coin
limit and an inflation schedule that had smooth, rather than abrupt,
drops. It'd also be reasonable to make that altcoin start with the same
UTXO set as Bitcoin as a means of initial coin distribution.
If miners choose to start mining that altcoin en-mass on the halving,
all the more power to them. It's our choice whether or not we buy those
coins. We may choose not to, but if 95% of the hashing power decides to
go mine something different we have to accept that under our current
chosen rules confirmations might take a long time.
Of course, personally I agree with Gregory Maxwell: this is all fairly
unlikely to happen, so the discussion is academic. But we'll see.
Doesn't strike me as an all-too-risky proposition. But then I've been awake too long, and sleep deprivation can really f*ck with your mind.
Edit: I just couldn't abbreviate Peter Tschipper's name in the same context. Fixed.
Last edited: