Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.
- Thread starter cypherdoc
- Start date
Christoph Bergmann
Active Member
Hmm, I'd prefer to do the same, but at the end of the day on r/btc everybody knows what to do and r/bitcoin stays the place where you get in touch with the manipulators and the manipulated.
Zarathustra
Well-Known Member
- Aug 28, 2015
- 1,439
- 3,797
they're here:
[doublepost=1456352155,1456351251][/doublepost]@Peter R
time to update your red zone tx graph and post it here. i want to tweet it to Ver.
[doublepost=1456352425][/doublepost]oh heavens. these guys are full of it:
Before the final copy was released officially Adam Back asked for that title to be changed to individual after consulting with others, including other Blockstream employees, as well non-Blockstream Bitcoin devs such as myself, both at the meeting and on IRC.
Last edited:
Zarathustra
Well-Known Member
- Aug 28, 2015
- 1,439
- 3,797
YarkoL
Active Member
Funnily enough, the PoW switch is being contemplated at both sides:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.msg13999162#msg13999162
It would be a riot if both camps ended up selecting the same algo at the same time...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.msg13999162#msg13999162
It would be a riot if both camps ended up selecting the same algo at the same time...
- Dec 16, 2015
- 2,806
- 6,088
@YarkoL: i have hypothesis which i'd like to put up here for debate:
As long as a project remains open-source, it cannot easily "break away" through POW without the blessing of its origin, since the origin can "follow the POW change" quite easily.
Like a divorce cannot be clean unless both parties are willing.
This could result in a dragged out, messy divorce "POW fight" until resources on one side are exhausted.
Addendum: whoever closes his source first is out of the race anyway -> unclean exit scam
As long as a project remains open-source, it cannot easily "break away" through POW without the blessing of its origin, since the origin can "follow the POW change" quite easily.
Like a divorce cannot be clean unless both parties are willing.
This could result in a dragged out, messy divorce "POW fight" until resources on one side are exhausted.
Addendum: whoever closes his source first is out of the race anyway -> unclean exit scam
wow, this is good news. gotta love the parsing:
[doublepost=1456355050][/doublepost]
[doublepost=1456355050][/doublepost]
Looks like F2Pool are testing Classic:
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/47f0b0/f2pool_testing_classic/
https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/47f0b0/f2pool_testing_classic/
@cypherdoc:
Is F2Pool saying that they can run Classic and still meet the round-table 'agreement' since it's compatible with Core for the "foreseeable future"?
Haha, if that's the case, it would certainly give Blockstream/Core a taste of their own semantic-trickery medicine.
Is F2Pool saying that they can run Classic and still meet the round-table 'agreement' since it's compatible with Core for the "foreseeable future"?
Haha, if that's the case, it would certainly give Blockstream/Core a taste of their own semantic-trickery medicine.
just on cue before the Chinese wake up and see the community reaction to the lack of consensus.
-ck suggests deleting the post and non other than Greg pipes up to say sure go ahead it's just a little whitewash in their favor if you remove the last few pages. What altruism!
gmaxwell said:
Last edited:
another classic from slush
https://blockchain.info/block/000000000000000006a553939f586b491f63d3158b3baee1fbdf06bd3c41becc
https://blockchain.info/block/000000000000000006a553939f586b491f63d3158b3baee1fbdf06bd3c41becc
@Peter R
yep, that's my reading.
"since Classic is not 'foreseeable' we can do whatever the hell we want!"
yep, that's my reading.
"since Classic is not 'foreseeable' we can do whatever the hell we want!"
lunar
Well-Known Member
- Aug 28, 2015
- 1,001
- 4,290
@sickpig
tradeblock says they got the last two.
you gotta love the news flow in the Bitcoin world, its ebbs and flows are better than the price chart.
tradeblock says they got the last two.
you gotta love the news flow in the Bitcoin world, its ebbs and flows are better than the price chart.
Just received an email from kraken (BS customer, see Liquid) that among other things just informs me that:
[doublepost=1456356791][/doublepost]kraken said:
unfortunately one of them is a version 4 block :/
And then KNC mined a Classic block immediately after. If that second Slush block had been a vote for Classic too, we'd have had three in a row!
