@Peter R
you beat me to it.
sequence of events: evoorhees (not one of us) makes a conciliatory post. nullc immediately kicks sand in his face in a self righteous indignant post indicating a high level of immaturity. Chakra_Scientist, one of his devout trolls, jumps right in on his tails trying to take advantage of the situation by dissing you an i. so many of those clowns project their own moral character by accusing me of holding sockpuppet accounts. fyi, i have *never* set up a sockpuppet account. nor have i ever *funded* one. i don't have time for such immature manipulations, yet they are convinced of it:
[doublepost=1453859772][/doublepost]this is exactly the sort of behavior that makes me think we have to fork away from Core's leadership. do you really want to use an implementation headed by ppl so immature and arrogant?
[doublepost=1453859962][/doublepost]
[doublepost=1453860020][/doublepost]
They've lost the debate. Ad hominem is the only recourse they have now.
just look at this denial from Greg. are you kidding me? multiple members of core dev were pounding r/bitcoin constantly during the summer trying to sway public opinion. how can he say this?:
[doublepost=1453860414,1453859664][/doublepost]
[doublepost=1453860598][/doublepost]in steps MOA, one of the most toxic of Core's followers: