The p2p networking of Bitcoin has been broken for a long time. I think it could be a major win to get some improvement moving there.personally, I'm more interested in attempting subchains if I get the time. However, it seems like there is space -- in fact it would be best if there were -- multiple protocols, to begin to create a more robust block and transaction delivery system.
Next is: interest rates down, stock markets up ...O shit, DAX looses ~10 percent in one week.
Oil on 11-year-low.
China stopps trading for the second time in one week.
What's next?
Eric Lombrozo said:For source code, please look at sipa's github repo:
https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin/tree/segwit
And some example signing code at my repo:
https://github.com/CodeShark/BitcoinScriptExperiments/blob/master/src/signwitnesstx.cpp
Several wallets have already committed to supporting it including mSIGNA, GreenAddress, GreenBits, Blocktrail, and NBitcoin. More wallets are expected to be added to this list soon. If you're a wallet dev and are interested in developing and testing on segnet please contact me.
We're right on schedule and are very excited about the fundamental improvements to bitcoin that segwit will enable.
Not very familiar with KYC/AML regulations or the proposed CT implementation for Bitcoin, but I like the way Monero handles this with view keys which let you reveal transactions if you feel inclined to comply with some regulation.What do you think on confidential transactions? I think they are the biggest risk bitcoin is facing in 2016. Much bigger than no increase of the blocksize, much bigger than a contentious hardfork to 20 MB.
Confidential Transactions will break the existing KYC/AML procedures on exchanges. It will set Bitcoin out of reach of regulation, and the consequence will be a worldwide ban.
I've said for a while that I think one reason govs have been relatively easy on Bitcoin is because of the default-open ledger. But fungibility is a key property of an ideal money, so obviously if we get a white/black/red listing scenario eventually, that would be an attack on Bitcoin's ability to be ideal money for our times.What do you think on confidential transactions? I think they are the biggest risk bitcoin is facing in 2016. Much bigger than no increase of the blocksize, much bigger than a contentious hardfork to 20 MB.
Confidential Transactions will break the existing KYC/AML procedures on exchanges. It will set Bitcoin out of reach of regulation, and the consequence will be a worldwide ban.
yeah, altho i'd probably eliminate the soft limit for miners out of simplicity cuz miners can already do this.Stephen Pair's recent blog seems to propose something super reasonable:
https://medium.com/@spair/a-simple-adaptive-block-size-limit-748f7cbcfb75#.70098pv5o