Gold collapsing. Bitcoin UP.

AdrianX

Well-Known Member
Aug 28, 2015
2,097
5,797
bitco.in
@JVWVU

Don't overlook (like the Wired article does) that Satoshi's coins are in different addresses of 50 BTC each, perhaps 20,000 or so. I had thought a while ago that if he was mining into 2011 he could drip-feed into the market from the latest ones without causing too much of a stir.
Sounds like his computer could mine enough to fund its existence too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JVWVU

Justus Ranvier

Active Member
Aug 28, 2015
875
3,746
I'd like to encourage everyone to read this thread. (3 pages long):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1089283.0;all

Make sure to view post signatures and view the comments of anyone you might have on an ignore list.

Which accounts in that thread presents an interpretation of the quote in the OP, and which ones appear to be actively working to fan the flames of outrage as high as possible regardless of the accuracy of their accusations?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rocks

JVWVU

Active Member
Oct 10, 2015
142
177
I dont understand the coding and logistics of coding thats why I depend on my bitcoin friends that do and to learn from knowledgable people here.

But if Wright is Satoshi the worrying about him dumping seems illogical to me (the monetary value of bitcoin info is things I understand)

Here is a slide presentatioon http://www.slideshare.net/mobile/informaoz/dr-craig-s-wright and profile https://theconversation.com/profiles/craig-s-wright-3334 that if reviewed shows his capabilities in wealth understanding

Wright himself has many interesting papers and seems excessively busy around 2011 and makes sense why he stepped away.


Appears the small block guys hates the concept of him as Satoshi with his Tulip Trading Supercomputer and his thoughts on big blocks as seen in Tweet comments above.

http://www.demorgan.com.au
 

Melbustus

Active Member
Aug 28, 2015
237
884
@JVWVU - Personally, I think the overhang of "satoshi's coins" is bad for the market as it's hard to make a case for why someone shouldn't *ever* have to worry about that supply hitting the market... Even if it sits dormant for a few decades and bitcoin volatility otherwise flattens out and we have a nice store-of-value/global-money, it'd always be possible that those coins could hit the market and cause a ruckus.

Historically, I've argued that odds are high Satoshi wouldn't ever slam the market, as that's obviously not in his financial interests, nor in the interests of supporting the system he created - a system he seemed to genuinely believe would help the world.

But try that argument with a bitcoin skeptic... Hence, I think Satoshi's coins are indeed a bit of a perpetual market overhang (unless they just got sent to an unspendable output one day (ideally one that looked something like: 1JustRemoveTheLimitALready...)).
 

lebing

Member
Nov 18, 2015
30
19
SF bay area
I am going to go out a limb and assume:

1. He is not Satoshi
2. If he was Satoshi, Satoshi would not leave his coins unencrypted on a hard drive somewhere for someone to come and raid.

So no, those coins will not be hitting the market.
 

rocks

Active Member
Sep 24, 2015
586
2,284
@lebing
Both of your statements are probably true. But we might have a situation where he is not Satoshi and so did not use Satoshi-level protection, but still has control over a Satoshi size stack of coins. There were a lot of coins mined in 2009/10, and it sounds he put together a super computer to mine back in the CPU mining era. If this is the case it is worry some. It means they might very well be easy for the tax man to seize, or under the control of someone not Satoshi.
 

Zangelbert Bingledack

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2015
1,485
5,585
Even if he's not Satoshi, he doesn't seem a slouch about security by any means. This isn't a 20-something DPR we're talking about. Also, judging from the timing of his appearance, he had prior warning they were coming. Plus there's the whole Seychelles thing, which while bizarre at least shows he made anti-confiscation arrangements, even elaborate ones, unlike Ulbricht. I have a hard time believing they will get the big stash of coins out of this guy easily.
 

awemany

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2015
1,387
5,054
@Zangelbert Bingledack :
Ok, I shouldn't think about something else mid-sentence. That question is of course total blockstream :)
What I meant was: What do you think about on-chain proof-of-stake voting like attaching votes to transactions?
[doublepost=1449649209][/doublepost]I am pretty sceptical regarding the new Satoshi-has-been-found media hype. I think the problem with articles like these is that they are basically just strings of confirmation-biased information. They don't really go and put in much evidence that would point away.

What is interesting though and I didn't seem mentioned is that this Wright guy went and worked for online casino stuff according to his Linked-In.

Didn't the really early Bitcoin code also contain references to a planned in-client Bitcoin-based Poker client?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: majamalu

Bagatell

Active Member
Aug 28, 2015
728
1,191
awemany said:
I am pretty sceptical regarding the new Satoshi-has-been-found media hype.
Likewise. The timing is particularly suspect coming so hard on the conclusion of the HK conference.
 

Zarathustra

Well-Known Member
Aug 28, 2015
1,439
3,797
Andrew Stone:

"I believe that the market should be making the decision of what should be on the Blockchain based on transaction fee, not Gregory Maxwell.
I believe that the market should be making the decision of how big blocks should be, not Gregory Maxwell."


https://forum.bitcoin.com/ama-ask-me-anything/i-am-andrew-stone-of-bitcoin-unlimited-ama-t3420-20.html?sid=32bd76f901248a5b6bd651dc6e710a85&sid=32bd76f901248a5b6bd651dc6e710a85

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/3w2562/andrew_stone_i_believe_that_the_market_should_be/
 

Zangelbert Bingledack

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2015
1,485
5,585
Damage control.

@awemany

It seems gameable and also not really representative. Some people do a lot of tx, some don't. If we go with stake voting, I think all roads lead to fork arbitrage or spinoffs. Unless I'm missing something, anything less perfect would only be of temporary use.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AdrianX