Norway
Well-Known Member
- Sep 29, 2015
- 2,424
- 6,410
So, how frequent will these checkpoints be?
What kind of defence?although by now there are probably better (automatic) ways of defense.
Probably as frequently as the FED meets on economic policy changes. I'll sleep on it before giving up on Bitcoin. I just hope I'm not the first to dump.So, how frequent will these checkpoints be?
100% agree. Security by centralized checkpoint presents the same pitfalls as liberty reserve, e-gold, etc. Game over.@freetrader good luck keeping the TPTB propaganda machine at bay and the control of the lead implementation in the hands of the minority. If you think you need tools like Checkpoints to protect against double spends and dishonest 51% hash power you overlooked the bitcoin innovation.
Every BCH client whose code I've looked at closely has implemented similar checkpoints during the BCH fork in August 2017.@freetrader good luck keeping the TPTB propaganda machine at bay and the control of the lead implementation in the hands of the minority. If you think you need tools like Checkpoints to protect against double spends and dishonest 51% hash power you overlooked the bitcoin innovation.
The answer is easy: Bitcoin Cash is quite simply meant as a money system, a system to do commerce with. And if you actively disrupt that with hash power you are being malicious.Who is 'we'? Who is in the position to "start to actually see" what is malicious and what's nice? The Judean People's Front or the People's Front of Judea?
Not what I wrote. I do choose my words carefully, hope the effort comes through.The clearest thinker since David Hume?!
Indeed it is fascinating to see how many think altruism (at risk of one's own annihilation, no less) is part of Bitcoin's security model.To see why the 51% attack isn't objectionable, you would have to do the thinking exercise proposed by zb but swap the two options for:
1) These types of attacks are part of the protocol design
2) These types of attacks are not
Then see how that fits with the result of the original exercise.
My result is that any rule change can be considered an attack on BCH, and any miner has a right to either attack (propose a new rule) or defend (attack the new rule).
Exemplary mindset.i do not know how to evaluate that argument but i do know how not to mistake it for FUD.