@Justus: I see, thanks!
I think keeping the scenario 7b alive, that the miners are bribed/'convinced' into getting bigger blocks on Bitcoin is essentially a variant of "see Bitcoin doesn't work"
already.
It is this uncertainty that keeps me from shifting further towards BCH and I suspect it is true for many others as well. If this uncertainty persists, it will depress the whole cryptocurrency space.
Which coin will be dominant long term?
If BTC scales on-chain, it will be BTC. Regardless of what BCH does.
Only if BCH scales on-chain
but BTC doesn't will it be BCH.
This is why I think they made a grave mistake with the initial HKC (as I and others here pointed out back then!) and this is also why I suspect (
@Zarathustra) that they made another mistake with BCH. They opened the door for the other side to continue and extend this kind of divide-and-conquer play.
This is the battle for/against viability of crypto and control over it. It is at the bottom of it not at all about blocksize as the main matter. I am still certain that both Adam and Greg and a couple others
know that Bitcoin needs bigger blocks.