- Dec 13, 2023
- 133
- 1
From "High Interest Fear" to "Real Economic Return": New Judgment Criteria Needed by Web3 Users
If the last cycle of Web3 taught us anything, it is that any high returns that leave the "true source of value" will eventually go to zero.
In the past few years, we have experienced too many "high interest traps": DeFi mining with an annualized return of tens of thousands, unlimited coin issuance models, pseudo-projects that rely on later generations' funds to maintain previous generations' profits, and compound interest models that "look beautiful".
These projects have one thing in common: the returns seem substantial, but they lack real business support. Their essence is not financial innovation, but structural Ponzi.
Therefore, many Web3 users form a conditioned reflex that as long as there are profits, dividends, and rewards in the project, they immediately suspect it is a high-interest plate.
This vigilance is a good thing, but it also creates a misconception: many users begin to be unable to distinguish between "real returns" and "high-interest scams".
So the question is, in this context, why can a project like Coinsidings, which is "behavior-driven + profit distribution", be separated from the category of "high-interest games"?
To answer this question, we must first break out of the old framework.
The next stage of Web3 is not the "high interest rate era", but the "Real-World Adoption era".
What really needs attention is: where does the profit come from? From the money of new users, or from real consumption and real assets? Is the economic cycle sustainable? Does participation create value?
The "sustainable income system" proposed by Coinsidings is a representative of this new trend. It is not a "promised annualization" or a "token airdrop", but rather a source of real orders, real assets, and real consumption, allowing income to have long-term vitality.
The best way to understand Coinsidings is to put it in the context of the entire evolution of the Web3 economy.
Where does the real profit come from? Coinsidings do not distribute profits out of thin air, but rather return value
The traditional high-interest plate is essentially a "money game" - using future money to fill the current hole.
Coinsidings' model is just the opposite: it does not rely on "capital entry" to maintain profits, but on "real economic activity" to generate value. Its profits mainly come from three core paths.
Coinsidings is essentially a Web3 travel booking platform, similar to the Web3 version of Airbnb/Booking, but with a completely different business model.
The revenue of traditional OTA comes from: 10-25% of merchants, commission advertising placement, promotion ranking fees, and price difference revenue
The difference of Coinsidings is that it divides the profits that originally belonged to the platform between users and merchants. When users book hotels or travel services, this is the platform's real income; the platform's commission is real cash, and merchants' orders are real transactions; order volume is verifiable data, and consumption behavior is transformed into "computing power" through AI, which in turn determines token and option rewards.
This is a verifiable, traceable, and auditable transaction model, not a "pie in the sky profit".
In other words, Coinsidings' profits are not promised to users, but objectively created by consumer behavior. This is completely different from traditional "high-interest plates".
Its RWA products include: hotel assets, resort room shares, timeshare rights, yacht cabins,
High-end homestay revenue rights.
The assets themselves generate cash flow, such as rental income from occupancy rates, usage income from resort time-sharing rights, and a potential ROI as asset prices rise.
Coinsidings divides these assets into RWA tokens, allowing users to obtain "micro shares" of these assets through consumption, computing power, options, point exchange, and other forms.
This means that the user's income is not the system out of thin air published, but the real hotel stay income, Real service transaction profit sharing, real asset appreciation feedback. This is the true meaning of Web3 × real economy.
These behaviors will be recognized and quantified by AI as "computing power". The higher the computing power, the more profit. This is a kind of "contribution mining", not "high-interest mining".
The advantage of computing power-driven revenue is that the more active the user, the higher the revenue, the more dedicated the merchant is, the higher the exposure, the more prosperous the ecosystem, and the more dividends.
Ultimately, a positive flywheel is formed: contribution behavior → platform growth → real benefits → redistribution → incentives for more contributions
This is a highly sustainable economic structure.
Why can this mechanism exist for a long time? Coinsidings' anti-bubble design
Coinsidings does not promise high interest rates, nor does it have "profits from pooling funds". Its design logic does not rely on "giving interest", but on "value return".
The following four points are the core foundation of its "Sustainability".
Price does not rise, no reward (P1 < P0 destroyed), behavior does not contribute, no computing power. This is not interest, but participation return. Its logic is closer to the fusion of Proof of Work + Proof of Stake + Proof of Behavior.
This means that users cannot "earn money lying down", they can only "contribute in exchange for income". This itself is the key to sustainability.
No high-interest plate would design such a model because it would make them "unable to pay interest". But for sustainable projects, this is the core mechanism for protecting long-term value.
The common effect of these mechanisms is that the rise depends on demand and the fall reduces chips. This is a kind of "economic ballast stone" to resist speculators and maintain steady growth.
This is the "core Competitive Edge" of Coinsidings' sustainability. In short, travel will not stop due to poor market conditions, consumption will not stop due to token fluctuations, but "behavioral mining" will be enhanced due to ecosystem growth, which is the biggest difference from high-interest games.
If the last cycle of Web3 taught us anything, it is that any high returns that leave the "true source of value" will eventually go to zero.
In the past few years, we have experienced too many "high interest traps": DeFi mining with an annualized return of tens of thousands, unlimited coin issuance models, pseudo-projects that rely on later generations' funds to maintain previous generations' profits, and compound interest models that "look beautiful".
These projects have one thing in common: the returns seem substantial, but they lack real business support. Their essence is not financial innovation, but structural Ponzi.
Therefore, many Web3 users form a conditioned reflex that as long as there are profits, dividends, and rewards in the project, they immediately suspect it is a high-interest plate.
This vigilance is a good thing, but it also creates a misconception: many users begin to be unable to distinguish between "real returns" and "high-interest scams".
So the question is, in this context, why can a project like Coinsidings, which is "behavior-driven + profit distribution", be separated from the category of "high-interest games"?
To answer this question, we must first break out of the old framework.
The next stage of Web3 is not the "high interest rate era", but the "Real-World Adoption era".
What really needs attention is: where does the profit come from? From the money of new users, or from real consumption and real assets? Is the economic cycle sustainable? Does participation create value?
The "sustainable income system" proposed by Coinsidings is a representative of this new trend. It is not a "promised annualization" or a "token airdrop", but rather a source of real orders, real assets, and real consumption, allowing income to have long-term vitality.
The best way to understand Coinsidings is to put it in the context of the entire evolution of the Web3 economy.
Where does the real profit come from? Coinsidings do not distribute profits out of thin air, but rather return value
The traditional high-interest plate is essentially a "money game" - using future money to fill the current hole.
Coinsidings' model is just the opposite: it does not rely on "capital entry" to maintain profits, but on "real economic activity" to generate value. Its profits mainly come from three core paths.
- Real consumption behavior: the real cash flow brought by travel orders
Coinsidings is essentially a Web3 travel booking platform, similar to the Web3 version of Airbnb/Booking, but with a completely different business model.
The revenue of traditional OTA comes from: 10-25% of merchants, commission advertising placement, promotion ranking fees, and price difference revenue
The difference of Coinsidings is that it divides the profits that originally belonged to the platform between users and merchants. When users book hotels or travel services, this is the platform's real income; the platform's commission is real cash, and merchants' orders are real transactions; order volume is verifiable data, and consumption behavior is transformed into "computing power" through AI, which in turn determines token and option rewards.
This is a verifiable, traceable, and auditable transaction model, not a "pie in the sky profit".
In other words, Coinsidings' profits are not promised to users, but objectively created by consumer behavior. This is completely different from traditional "high-interest plates".
- Real asset returns: RWA provides realistic support for returns
Its RWA products include: hotel assets, resort room shares, timeshare rights, yacht cabins,
High-end homestay revenue rights.
The assets themselves generate cash flow, such as rental income from occupancy rates, usage income from resort time-sharing rights, and a potential ROI as asset prices rise.
Coinsidings divides these assets into RWA tokens, allowing users to obtain "micro shares" of these assets through consumption, computing power, options, point exchange, and other forms.
This means that the user's income is not the system out of thin air published, but the real hotel stay income, Real service transaction profit sharing, real asset appreciation feedback. This is the true meaning of Web3 × real economy.
- System demand drives revenue: the economic flywheel of computing power, membership, and options
These behaviors will be recognized and quantified by AI as "computing power". The higher the computing power, the more profit. This is a kind of "contribution mining", not "high-interest mining".
The advantage of computing power-driven revenue is that the more active the user, the higher the revenue, the more dedicated the merchant is, the higher the exposure, the more prosperous the ecosystem, and the more dividends.
Ultimately, a positive flywheel is formed: contribution behavior → platform growth → real benefits → redistribution → incentives for more contributions
This is a highly sustainable economic structure.
Why can this mechanism exist for a long time? Coinsidings' anti-bubble design
Coinsidings does not promise high interest rates, nor does it have "profits from pooling funds". Its design logic does not rely on "giving interest", but on "value return".
The following four points are the core foundation of its "Sustainability".
- Computing power "replaces" interest ", and income is based on contribution
Price does not rise, no reward (P1 < P0 destroyed), behavior does not contribute, no computing power. This is not interest, but participation return. Its logic is closer to the fusion of Proof of Work + Proof of Stake + Proof of Behavior.
This means that users cannot "earn money lying down", they can only "contribute in exchange for income". This itself is the key to sustainability.
- Price condition release: issue only when it rises, destroy when it falls
- Record Join Price P0
- Calculate the market price P1 daily.
- If P1 ≥ P0 → Token issuance
- If P1 < P0 → all destroyed on the same day
No high-interest plate would design such a model because it would make them "unable to pay interest". But for sustainable projects, this is the core mechanism for protecting long-term value.
- Multiple Destruction + LP Burning + Tax Return Enhance Coin Price Stability
The common effect of these mechanisms is that the rise depends on demand and the fall reduces chips. This is a kind of "economic ballast stone" to resist speculators and maintain steady growth.
- Real tourism demand forms a "sustainable source of funds".
This is the "core Competitive Edge" of Coinsidings' sustainability. In short, travel will not stop due to poor market conditions, consumption will not stop due to token fluctuations, but "behavioral mining" will be enhanced due to ecosystem growth, which is the biggest difference from high-interest games.