VOTING for President

[theZerg]

The candidates are Andrew Clifford (solex), Trevin Hofmann (TrevinHofmann) and Lee Adams (LeeAdams here, redditchampsys on reddit).

Please reply to this thread with a vote in the following format. Let's propose Daffy, Minnie and Mickey are running, and you want Daffy, are OK with Minnie but don't want Mickey. You'd then vote like this:

Daffy: VOTE
Minnie: yes
Mickey: no

So Daffy gets your vote. But if Minnie gets the majority, you vote "yes" to Minnie's BUIP (it must pass based on the criteria specified in the Articles -- of course all "VOTE" words also count as "yes"), and if Mickey gets the majority, you vote "no" to the BUIP.

You must only write "VOTE" at most ONCE, write "yes" or "no" as many times as you wish. Please quote this section and fill it out:

Andrew Clifford (solex):
Trevin Hoffmann (TrevinHofmann):
Lee Adams (redditchampsys):

 

[Peter Tschipper]

Andrew Clifford (solex): VOTE

 

[Zarathustra]

Andrew Clifford (solex): VOTE

 

[sickpig]

Andrew Clifford (solex): VOTE

 

[solex]

Andrew Clifford (solex): VOTE

Edit: Adding sig, as I agree it is best practice even though it is waived today.

15TiujYmnHa33fjEnasBBm1eWcGx9YEXPL

ILU7p53X2rRKk5gwUcY2L+QW1Qupq+/eE0DW/PfhyPLSW46GhIGnbjV350K9c8f588oyp5nBUzUsk+byuFcbwIs=

 

[cypherdoc]

Andrew Clifford (solex): VOTE

 

[Aquent]

Andrew Clifford (solex):VOTE

Trevin Hoffmann (TrevinHofmann): Yes.

Trevin has been a huge asset and has helped tremendously, but Andrew Clifford makes 3 Andrews

 

[Peter R]

Andrew Clifford (solex): VOTE

Trevin Hoffmann (TrevinHofmann): Yes

 

[YarkoL]

Trevin Hoffmann (TrevinHofmann): VOTE
Andrew Clifford (solex): Yes

I'm really happy with either one, but Trevin Hoffmann's "Less bureaucracy"-line resonates with me.

 

[TrevinHofmann]

Andrew Clifford (solex): YES
Trevin Hofmann (TrevinHofmann): VOTE
Lee Adams (redditchampsys): YES

 

[Lee Adams]

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Andrew Clifford (solex): yes
Trevin Hoffmann (TrevinHofmann):yes
Lee Adams (redditchampsys): VOTE
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: 1ruQ2wceuMt83aXQsERyWGxQawHqXERSd

IKfpt1niPfcgCWB9bauX2666VddzOGdxtUNFuTN3gpjiEyEulFzPl/laNId2axW6R2etlMHTqnFIa67900xZnXQ=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----

 

[kcfnrybak]

Vote Solex YES

 

[Inca]

Andrew Clifford (solex): VOTE
Trevin Hoffmann (TrevinHofmann): Yes.

May the best man win.

 

[bitsko]

Andrew Clifford (solex): VOTE

 

[Lee Adams]

Andrew Clifford (solex): VOTE

@Zarathustra @bitsko Before you can vote, you will need to post to this thread to apply for membership together with a signing key.
[doublepost=1452904262,1452903513][/doublepost]

Andrew Clifford (solex):VOTE

Trevin Hoffmann (TrevinHofmann): Yes.

@Aquent @Inca @kcfnrybak : Please remember to add your signing keys to this thread.

 

[TrevinHofmann]

@Lee Adams - I don't think you can vote in this election if you sign up past this post, January 5. I think we're also skipping signatures this time around. It would still be great if more people sign up and post their public keys, though!

 

[Lee Adams]

@TrevinHofmann My wording was very specific.[1] I want to stick with neutral helpful comments for now, because @theZerg is still benevolent dictator and could change the rules.

[1] People posting to that thread may still be able to vote for other BUIPs.

 

[Melbustus]

Andrew Clifford (solex): VOTE

 

[Wary]

Andrew Clifford (solex): VOTE

 

[VeritasSapere]

Andrew Clifford (solex): VOTE