Announcement - Bitcoin project to full fork to flexible blocksizes

Richy_T

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2015
1,085
2,741
It occurs to me that having at least some kind of merchant presence ready to accept Bitcoin+ at launch would be a good thing. Though I'm not sure if forcing it would be very beneficial.
 
  • Like
Reactions: freetrader

freetrader

Moderator
Staff member
Dec 16, 2015
2,806
6,088
  • Like
Reactions: Bloomie and bitsko

freetrader

Moderator
Staff member
Dec 16, 2015
2,806
6,088
Client identification mostly done (needs checking of application interface and outputs though - happy for any bug reports)



Now we'll get on to the meaty details of the fork implementation.
 

freetrader

Moderator
Staff member
Dec 16, 2015
2,806
6,088
First pull request for serious MVF-BU functionality now open for review, thanks to @redmarlen :)

https://github.com/BTCfork/hardfork_prototype_1_mvf-bu/pull/10

I will be reviewing it myself, but any additional would-be reviewers should take into account the relevant SW requirements and design, as well as the MVF-BU coding guidelines and test design:

https://github.com/BTCfork/bitcoinfork-collaborative-spec/blob/unlimited/requirements.md#4-sw-reqs
https://github.com/BTCfork/bitcoinfork-collaborative-spec/blob/unlimited/design.md#5-detailed-design
https://github.com/BTCfork/hardfork_prototype_1_mvf-bu/blob/master/doc/mvf-bu-coding-guideline.md
https://github.com/BTCfork/hardfork_prototype_1_mvf-bu/blob/master/doc/mvf-bu-test-design.md

The PR hasn't fully traced code to design elements, but I don't consider that crucial at this stage (we can go over the code later and ensure it's all traced).
I will point out traceable elements where I find them, but other would-be reviewers can focus on functional changes and implementation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bitsko

freetrader

Moderator
Staff member
Dec 16, 2015
2,806
6,088