- Dec 27, 2015
- 140
- 203
Here's a very quick write-up of an idea I had for a soft-fork blocksize increase. I haven't thought about this much yet and it's quite probable that the idea is flawed.
https://gist.github.com/roybadami/205a68c431fd9b6ca586584e65c5f727
I will say that I find it somewhat ugly. I would much rather HF a blocksize increase. But it is, to my mind, less ugly (and conceptually much simpler) than any other not-a-hardfork blocksize increase proposal I've seen to date. Would love feedback on the idea.
https://gist.github.com/roybadami/205a68c431fd9b6ca586584e65c5f727
I will say that I find it somewhat ugly. I would much rather HF a blocksize increase. But it is, to my mind, less ugly (and conceptually much simpler) than any other not-a-hardfork blocksize increase proposal I've seen to date. Would love feedback on the idea.
Last edited: