Why do CSS options outperform traditional financial products? A deep analysis of the return logic

19880

Member
Mar 21, 2025
63
0
Traditional wealth management products are mostly based on the "promised return" mechanism of Financial Institutions, with limited returns and poor liquidity; while Coinsidings' CSS options, based on blockchain smart contracts, have built a stable, secure, and flexible "decentralized wealth management" system for users through platform real income dividends.
CSS options come from four major paths: consumption, invitation, asset holding, and platform active behavior. Different types of options have different return coefficients (with a maximum contribution of 0.5), and participate in quarterly platform profit dividends, covering multiple dimensions such as platform trading commissions, advertising revenue, and NFT asset returns. The dividend mechanism is not maintained by a fund pool, but relies on stable returns from real business scenarios.
More importantly, CSS options have a flexible release mechanism, supporting linear withdrawal, as well as staking, liquidity mining, and transfer transactions, providing users with stronger asset scheduling capabilities. At the same time, options will be reflected as CSO equity stakes in the future, with the identity and governance rights of "platform shareowners", achieving a leap from "holding coins" to "holding stocks".
Compared to traditional financial products with an annualized return of less than 5%, CSS options are supported by platform growth dividends and Incentive Mechanism. Their dividend yield potential is much higher than that of traditional models, and they support reinvestment, referral, and cross-ecosystem use, making them a truly suitable "value-anchored asset" for the Web3 era.