Alternative Cryptocurrency Discussion

VeritasSapere

Active Member
Nov 16, 2015
511
1,266
1
Bitcoin NO PREMINE or PRESALE.

2
Ethereum Transparent PRESALE and PREMINE
3
Ripple PREMINED
4
Litecoin NO PREMINE or PRESALE. NO INNOVATION.
5
Dogecoin NO PREMINE or PRESALE. NO INNOVATION.
6
Dash NO PREMINE or PRESALE.
7
MaidSafeCoin Transparent PRESALE
8
BitShares Transparent PRESALE
9
Factom Transparent PRESALE
10
Peercoin NO PREMINE or PRESALE.

11
Stellar PREMINED
12
Nxt Transparent PRESALE
13
VPNCoin ???
14
Emercoin NO PREMINE or PRESALE.
15
YbCoin ???
16
Bytecoin PREMINED SCAM
17
Monero NO PREMINE or PRESALE.
18
Namecoin NO PREMINE or PRESALE.


Creating this thread for the discussion of altcoins.

@Zangelbert Bingledack started this list, I modified it according to my own understanding, I thought it was a useful and insightful depiction of the top eighteen cryptocurrencies out there. Any critiques are welcome. :)
 
Last edited:

Bagatell

Active Member
Aug 28, 2015
728
1,191
What are their respective USPs?

1. Bitcoin - money
2. Ethereum - contracts
3. Factom - notaries and records
17. Monero - private, fungible money
18. Namecoin - DNS stuff
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeritasSapere

VeritasSapere

Active Member
Nov 16, 2015
511
1,266
Good question. :)

1. Bitcoin - money
2. Ethereum - contracts, touring complete scripting language
3. Ripple - settlement network between banks
6. Dash - private, fungible money
7. Maidsafe - decentralized and anonymous internet, cloud storage.
8. Bitshares - tokens, shares, pegs and DAO's.
9. Factom - notaries and records
11. Stellar - settlement network between banks
12. NXT - tokens, shares and DAO's
14. Emercoin - notaries and records, DNS stuff
17. Monero - private, fungible money
18. Namecoin - DNS stuff

There is much more I can say about each of these, and obviously Bitcoin can be used for most of these applications as well, but this is just what use cases are the focus for these projects.
 
Last edited:

solex

Moderator
Staff member
Aug 22, 2015
1,558
4,693
I like this thread because although I really really want Bitcoin to succeed as a global reserve currency and payment system, it is only wise to not only observe but be positioned in alternatives. There is no moral imperative being a Betamax or MySpace fanboy and riding all the way down to oblivion. [Not that I think that will happen. I am still optimistic for BTC].

Ripple. I do not consider this true cryptocurrency. The amount of issuance can be increased at a stroke. It is proving to be a failure, even after years of dev. If ripple really worked then it would facilitate arbitrage flows for fiat smoothing out the different BTC prices on the major exchanges

Counterparty. About a year ago I did buy some units, and it still has promise but is of course dependent upon the success of BTC.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: VeritasSapere

jwinterm

New Member
Sep 13, 2015
2
1
"6
Dash NO PREMINE or PRESALE. FAIR"

I don't understand why Bytecoin gets listed as a premined scam but you let XCoin/Darkcoin/Dash off the hook. Bytecoin mined 80-something% before proper launch, Dash mined 30-something% before launch; is the cutoff 50% premine before it becomes a scam?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nate2nate

VeritasSapere

Active Member
Nov 16, 2015
511
1,266
The difference is that there was no pre-mine with Dash. There was a ridiculously large amount mined in the first two days due to a "glitch" in the difficulty algorithm, which has since been changed, Over ten percent of the total supply of Dash was mined in these two days, this is not ideal but it is certainly is not a scam or a pre-mine since it was open for everyone to participate.

I will not get into ByteCoin, that has proven to be a scam, A hidden pre-mine is quite different to a flawed mining emission schedule in the early life of a small obscure coin.

I explained it more in this post:
https://bitco.in/forum/threads/gold-collapsing-bitcoin-up.16/page-331#post-11905

Welcome to the forum by the way, I see that you are new here, there are good people here and a lot less trolls compared to some other places I will not mention, and no censorship. A good place for real discussion and expansion of our understanding of cryptocurrencies. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: freetrader

smooth

New Member
Sep 19, 2015
5
10
I disagree with you about Dash being 'fair'.

It is true there was no literal premine in the sense of coins magically appearing in the genesis block.

However, the developer stated that the coin would be not be launched within hours, told people who where waiting for the launch to go to sleep, and then launched it a few hours later.

The developer also withheld the information about what features were planned for coin.

So while, theoretically, anyone could mine it, no one (unless possessing non-public information) had any particular reason to do so, and some of the people who wanted to mine it anyway were misled into not doing so during the critical period.

I can't agree that any of that is 'fair'.

I would break down the original list slightly differently by the way. Some premines could be called 'fair' if the nature of the premine is fully disclosed up front (all of the above premined coins except BCN I believe). One may or may not want to get involved with coins with a premine of course, but with clear and complete disclosure I see no inherent 'unfairness'. (Ethereum, BTW, has both a premine and a presale.)

I'd note as a potential conflict of interest that I'm involved with Monero and some may see Dash as competing with Dash. Nevertheless, there are other coins that some may see as competing with Monero (for example Zcash) where I see no deceptive conduct or 'unfairness' even though they may have various forms of presale/premine/devtax. As long as everything is clearly disclosed, then anything can be fair (which doesn't necessarily make it a good investment of course).

Since he didn't note it, I will add that the OP acknowledges his own conflict with respect to Dash in the linked post (but not here): "Now regarding this controversy in the past of Dash which I thoroughly investigated before I invested into the project myself".

To Zangelbert Bingledack, who commented on the linked thread about shadiness and innovation not going together that is not really correct. BCN was highly innovative but extremely shady. Dash is innovative in the sense that it has introduced a series of new features and is also shady. So while there indeed have been many, many shady non-innovative coins, being innovative is no guarantee of legitimacy. There are people who are willing to do real development work but not content with a 'fair' share of the rewards, they want a little (or a lot) extra on the side.
 

VeritasSapere

Active Member
Nov 16, 2015
511
1,266
In regards to a conflict of interest, I am invested in all of the cryptocurrencies highlighted on this list. Being invested in both Monero and Dash I like to think that I am not as biased in regards to the preferential treatment of either.

I have at least disclosed this controversy as well, I have been completely open and forward with this information.

Here is a link to the important thread created by @smooth criticizing the launch of Dash: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=999886.0

I am happy that you have decided to contribute to this thread, your article criticizing the launch of Dash was actually one of my primary sources when investigating its launch. I am going to the gym now, to train is important and keeps my mind sharp as well. I would like to continue this discussion when I return, and for now I will add the words "contested" to Dash, until we can discuss this some more. :)
 
Last edited:

VeritasSapere

Active Member
Nov 16, 2015
511
1,266
I will not get to deep into defending all of the points relating to its launch since everyone can look into it themselves, the information is out there. I thought this post by AlexGR was actually rather relevant and reflects my sentiment well on the matter. I suggest that for anyone that does want to know more to read that thread, the discussion in there is rather interesting, I do not see the point in rehashing that entire discussion in here.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=999886.msg10856237#msg10856237
I disagree with you about Dash being 'fair'.

It is true there was no literal premine in the sense of coins magically appearing in the genesis block.
That is good, we can agree that there was no premine for Dash.
However, the developer stated that the coin would be not be launched within hours, told people who where waiting for the launch to go to sleep, and then launched it a few hours later.
I can agree that the launch was not ideal, however this is not that unusual for such an obscure and experimental coin at the time. This is something that I think is important to keep in mind.
The developer also withheld the information about what features were planned for coin.
This is not accurate, not knowing what the coin would become is not the same as withholding information, this is again a characteristic of such a small altcoin project. Dash has grown rather organically over the years as it has continued to gain support, and I think based on the merits of its technology as well.
So while, theoretically, anyone could mine it, no one (unless possessing non-public information) had any particular reason to do so, and some of the people who wanted to mine it anyway were misled into not doing so during the critical period.
I suppose that I can agree that this is somewhat of a dilemma, this is also true for most small cryptocurrencies that later become much larger, Bitcoin is also an example of this, Satoshi mined more then a million Bitcoins because other people did not know about it or believed in it, is that unfair?
I can't agree that any of that is 'fair'.

I would break down the original list slightly differently by the way. Some premines could be called 'fair' if the nature of the premine is fully disclosed up front (all of the above premined coins except BCN I believe). One may or may not want to get involved with coins with a premine of course, but with clear and complete disclosure I see no inherent 'unfairness'. (Ethereum, BTW, has both a premine and a presale.)

I'd note as a potential conflict of interest that I'm involved with Monero and some may see Dash as competing with Dash. Nevertheless, there are other coins that some may see as competing with Monero (for example Zcash) where I see no deceptive conduct or 'unfairness' even though they may have various forms of presale/premine/devtax. As long as everything is clearly disclosed, then anything can be fair (which doesn't necessarily make it a good investment of course).
I think you have identified a valid problem with the term "fair" in my opening post. It is actually highly subjective, for example I see as Ethereum as being relativly fair whereas I do not consider that to be the case with Zcash. Another example might how one person might consider capitalism fair while another might consider socialism more fair. It is clear that we can not use this term in this regard because of its highly subjective nature, I think @Zangelbert Bingledack also in part pointed this out.

Therefore we should think of better terms, I will remove fair and replace it with "transparent" for now until we come up with some better terms. Thank you @smooth for helping me to come to this realization. :)
Since he didn't note it, I will add that the OP acknowledges his own conflict with respect to Dash in the linked post (but not here): "Now regarding this controversy in the past of Dash which I thoroughly investigated before I invested into the project myself".
Not sure what the point of this is considering that you have a stronger conflict of interests now that you know that I am invested in both projects. I have the admit the constant attacks on other anonymous cryptocurrencies by some members of the Monero community not to mention their involvement in the blocksize debate, has left me with a bad taste in my mouth. I know that these are individuals that do not represent Monero and are not even necessarily reflective of the wider community, I have met many good people that are Monero supporters as well, the technology after all is very good. If you could, just tell IceBreaker to tone down his rhetoric a bit, he is making you guys look bad. :p
To Zangelbert Bingledack, who commented on the linked thread about shadiness and innovation not going together that is not really correct. BCN was highly innovative but extremely shady. Dash is innovative in the sense that it has introduced a series of new features and is also shady. So while there indeed have been many, many shady non-innovative coins, being innovative is no guarantee of legitimacy. There are people who are willing to do real development work but not content with a 'fair' share of the rewards, they want a little (or a lot) extra on the side.
You are falsely implying that there was foul play in the early history of Dash, I know that you are generalizing but it should be clear to most people what you are doing here. The truth is that we do not know if there was any foul play or corrupt practices in those early days, the circumstances certainly would have allowed for that or it could have just been a genuine mistake. I suppose that is an important point for me to make, I think it is a great project today and it is certainly not a scam. The technology is very good, with a great community and good distribution. I think it is a good investment, just like Monero is as well. ;)
 
Last edited:

smooth

New Member
Sep 19, 2015
5
10
I will narrow to just a few points of disagreement so hopefully we can move on and not derail this thread into a Dash critique.

"I can agree that the launch was not ideal, however this is not that unusual for such an obscure and experimental coin at the time. This is something that I think is important to keep in mind."

Yes there were many shady coin launches at the time, during the peak of altcoin scams in 2013-2014. Attempting to equate with that particular peer group (whether or not the equivalence is valid) hardly makes Dash look any better.

"This is not accurate, not knowing what the coin would become is not the same as withholding information"

It is indeed not the same. The developer withheld information. Will it be necessary for me to quote original sources, or is it just sufficient for us to agree that the launch (and distribution of 30% of) Dash was extremely shady, leave it at that, and let this thread be a discussion of altcoins generally and not yet another rehashing of the not-so-pretty events surrounding Dash's instamine?
 

VeritasSapere

Active Member
Nov 16, 2015
511
1,266
I can agree that the distribution of 30% of the currency in circulation now was mined during this early period which was far from ideal, even shady if you will. I personally still think that Dash is a great project and I lean towards the notion that this was all an honest mistake. But I can not deny that foul play and corruption could have taken place, the circumstances certainly did allow for it. Personally I do not mind if Evan mined a lot of those early coins as long as the glitch in the difficulty algorithm was not put there on purpose, ironically this early wealth has helped the project out significantly.

Unfortunately shadiness and technological innovation often do go hand in hand. There are plenty of historical examples of this. Wernher von Braun's involved in the Apollo program is one example of this for instance. ;)
 
Last edited:

slb

New Member
Feb 14, 2016
1
0
If you premine 30% of the total supply in the first 2 days "by mistake" would you relaunch?
I personally don't mind if Bytecoin's devs mined a lot of these 80% of coins, but does it make it less premined? I hope you understand it's the same logic.
As far as I am informed, and I think I have a very good information and observations, Darkcoin/DASH is deliberately disinforming new users. Not just about "premine".
 

VeritasSapere

Active Member
Nov 16, 2015
511
1,266
I think relaunching is even more problematic, what about the people that did mine the currency or invest in it, you can not just restart the currency then Evan really would have broken all trust. Again it was not a premine even smooth agrees with this, Bytecoin is very different, a hidden premine is much worse regardless of the amount. I do not think Dash is deliberately misinforming users, maybe you should back such accusations up with some facts at least.
 

VeritasSapere

Active Member
Nov 16, 2015
511
1,266
They have been playing musical chairs for some time now, I would expect Monero to drop a bit soon after such a sharp rise.

Just realized that list is not sorted by market capitalization, how strange. Dash still has more then twice the market capitalization of Monero, which does make sense.

Dash has a self funding blockchain, instant confirmations, incentivized full nodes, voting mechanism as well as optional anonymity. These are all features that Monero does not have, not to mention that Monero is not at all user friendly still requiring command line, since an official GUI wallet has not been developed yet.
 
Last edited:

tungfa

Member
Feb 14, 2016
63
17
coingekko ?
oh come on, they have the craziest listing !
Dodge has more Dev done than Eth ?
where are they getting their numbers ?
 

VeritasSapere

Active Member
Nov 16, 2015
511
1,266
I find some of the dynamics of the altcoin world very strange sometimes. Many people seem to really hate Dash, often in proportion with how much they love Monero. My advice is not to so be single mindfully obsessed with any single cryptocurrency. Not to be so emotional about it and try to be more objective. I think such devotion to any singular cryptocurrency blinds us from reality, I think the same is true for some Bitcoin maximalists as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tungfa

tungfa

Member
Feb 14, 2016
63
17
i totally agree
no idea where these haters get their hate from .... as usual, we are all in the same boat (crypto scene) and we should all work together and NOT troll and spam others, it is not only unprofessional it gives a bad name to the entire crypto scene !
 
  • Like
Reactions: VeritasSapere

nate2nate

New Member
Feb 1, 2017
3
0
I find Maidsafe to be super interesting personally... just the idea behind it. I never seem to hear much talk about it, but it seems like it should have a lot of potential.